![]() (when I used Photoshop in, I think, the early '90s, the photos were of course always scanned). Dealing with photos has always been part of its M.O. Images of any kind: digital drawings, logos, whatever. It is an image program designed to prepare images for print. Photoshop is a program designed on a MUCH older concept. But since I'm not sure that you need Lightroom either, it's hard for me to know what to say. I'd like to make this easy and say simply that you don't need Photoshop. Second question: Lightroom or Photoshop (or both, or neither)? But if I were working on fewer photos, I don't know, maybe The Gimp would do the trick. I could not personally use it for the photography that I do, because I am typically processing hundreds of photos a week. I think I get that Lightroom is more of a image management program, but what would you say are the big distinguishing factors? If I already use GIMP for basic touching up, would there be a reason for me to get Lightroom or Photoshop?You are asking two quite different questions, I think.įirst question: Do you need something better than The Gimp? ![]() But I use both depending on what I need to accomplish. I basically want to do what Cloggie_UK did to my picture here: and photoshop are complementary programs. (I do not own either of these programs, but just realized today that since I am taking a class at a time towards a master's degree, that I am eligible for student discounts!) I think I get that Lightroom is more of a image management program, but what would you say are the big distinguishing factors? If I already use GIMP for basic touching up, would there be a reason for me to get Lightroom or Photoshop? (I'm assuming you can do all these things in Photoshop as well) But it seems like Lightroom has a very simple interface to do some very powerful things, like sharpen functions that actually look good, etc. With some finishing touches on top, it took no more than 15 minutes for the complete edit of the example photo.I figure that Photoshop can do way more image editing than Lightroom, not to mention graphics creation. ![]() With a click of a button and some fine-tuning, I can quickly apply creative edits to my images. Similar to Lightroom, it allows the creation of presets. But what I like to do recently is use Luminar NEO. In Photoshop, you can make use of actions. In Lightroom, I already use a set of custom presets that reflect my typical editing style. Maybe the most important part of professional photo editing is automation. Each brings me closer to the final result while maintaining image quality that can suffer from drastic adjustments. I like to build up the effect through a combination of subtle improvements. ![]() My photo editing is not about big changes with a single filter or setting. The two resulting photos are the starting point of the creative workflow I share in the tutorial. I performed the focus stacking in Helicon Focus. In Lightroom, I applied some basic settings to the complete sequence of images and used the HDR merge tool for the background shots. To capture this photo, I used exposure bracketing and focus stacking in the field to capture all the details. In the feature video, I show my complete workflow in Photoshop and Luminar NEO for the editing of a challenging backlight image.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |